US 14/WIS 11 Corridor Study, Schedule - Wisconsin Department of Transportation

US 14/WIS 11 Corridor Study

Need/purpose

Schedule

FAQ

Maps

Environmental documents

Public involvement

Contacts

US 14/WIS 11 Corridor Study - Schedule

For more information on public information meetings (PIM), hearings and other public activities, visit Public involvement.

The US 14/WIS 11 Corridor Study will consist of four phases. The public is invited to participate in each phase. Elected officials and government agencies will also work together to provide ideas and help make decisions during the process.

Current

2011 - Enviromental Impact Statement (EIS) preparation continues

Future

Summer 2013 - EIS preparation is scheduled to be completed

Prepare EIS - An EIS comparing impacts of selected alternatives, including a "no-build" alternative and on-alignment improvements will be prepared. The EIS will suggest a preferred alternative.

2012 - EIS preparation continues

Past

Fall 2010 - EIS preparation was started

Summer 2008-fall 2010

Evaluate alternatives - Evaluating the different alternatives and receiving feedback from the public regarding the alternatives. Evaluation of the alternatives will be based on environmental and local impacts, level of mobility and safety improvement, cost, right of way needs and other factors.

Spring 2006-summer 2008

Develop alternatives - A full range of improvement alternatives was developed to meet the needs of the corridor. These alternatives were developed in coordination with local officials and state and federal agencies. The full range of alternatives will be narrowed down to a range of feasible alternatives which will be carried through the environmental document.

Fall 2003-spring 2006

Needs Assessment (NA) - The NA phase focused on how the highway currently served people living and working in the area, how it moved regional traffic and how it was expected to operate in the future.

The project team gathered data about a variety of issues, such as current and future traffic volumes, crash data, environmental constraints, and how the highway affected land use patterns, the general public and economics in the area. Data was provided by local officials and committee members and included in the study.